Greg Clayton
Convergence Blog #1
9/23/15
The
society of the spectacle is Debord’s rhetoric of calling an open and free
market exchange of goods and services detrimental to the overall good of
society because we will all become slaves to our possessions and greed. That society as a whole will cease to
function, and people will be so caught up in their own vanity of wealth, that
basic human necessities and the need to coexist will be swallowed up by the spectacle
of commodity. How’s his prediction so
far? Yes, some people can get caught up
in the spectacle, if you let it. But
what Debord fails to recognize is that not all people who seek success or
certain material possessions are inherently bad or corrupt. Some people work hard for what they have, and
do not necessarily partake in the spectacle, but rather carve out a nice life
for themselves and stand in the shadows of the spectacle, but are included in
Debord’s generalizations. Why does
society need to answer to Debord because they buy unnecessary material items? If
he does not like the “spectacle” than why is he throwing his hat into the ring
and being part of it? He publishes
books, he makes films. To me, someone
who is fed up with a society that makes a “spectacle” of itself and then gains
from that opinion is a hypocrite. In quote 35 Debord says “…we recognize our
old enemy the commodity, which at
first glance so trivial and obvious, yet which is actually so complex and full
of metaphysical subtleties.” (Debord Chapter 2, 35). It’s almost comical to call commodity “our old
enemy” because it is as natural as nature itself. Debord’s world is delusional at best, sorry
metaphysical.
Commodity
isn’t the spectacle, it is the absence of basic human decency and the ability
to better the world around people who have been given or earned said
commodity. The spectacle is the Paris Hilton’s
of the world, not the Warren Buffet’s or Bill Gates’. In an article by Anselm Jappe posted by Alias
Recluse on libcom.org, Mr. Jappe
contends, “The commodity and its general form, money, might have served a
positive function at first, facilitating the expansion of needs. But its
structure is like a time bomb, a virus inscribed in the genetic code of modern
society. The more the commodity seizes control of society, the more it
undermines the foundations of society itself, rendering it entirely
uncontrollable and transforming it into a self-operating machine. It is thus
not a question of praising or condemning the commodity; it is the commodity
itself which will get rid of itself over the long term, and maybe not just
itself. The commodity inexorably destroys the society of the commodity. As a
form of indirect and unconscious socialization, it cannot but produce
disasters” (Jappe 1993). That was
in1993. Debord’s realizations and predictions were in the 60’s. When are these going to come to fruition?
When will success be welcomed and not seen as a curse or a downfall of a
society but a means to an end?
Bibliography
Debord, Guy. The Society of the
Spectacle. New York: Zone, 1994. Print.
"Debord, Guy - Anselm
Jappe." Debord, Guy - Anselm Jappe. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Oct.
2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment