The
evolution of technological means for the written word have changed the way people
share and communicate with each other. Creations such as the web, computers,
social media, and smart phones make sharing words and images an instantaneous
phenomenon. With easy access to sharing and creating content on the web,
careers such as journalism and photography have found themselves in a
professionalism grey zone. Now that publishing for public view can happen in an
instant, almost anyone with access to the internet can become a writer or
photographer themselves. In Everybody is a Media Outlet and Publish, Then Filter, Clay Shirky
elaborates on the mass amateurization of the professions, analyzing how it
effects the sharing of user generated content, and how it will ultimately mold
the future of media once again. Furthermore, in Why Heather Can Write, Henry Jenkins discusses the relationships
between fan fiction communities online and the amateurization of an author’s
work.
![]() |
Tumblr as a Mass Amateurization Outlet for Blogging (Find Image Here) |
In
Everybody is a Media Outlet, Shirky
explains “mass amateurization” as the decrease in the need for a profession
because the art form and specialty of it have been lost in the masses. Shirky
explains, “As new capabilities go, unlimited perfect copyability is a lulu…digital
means of distributing words and images have robbed newspapers of the coherence
they formerly had [making] the newspaper
merely provisional solution” (Shirky, 59). Shirky looks back the
specified need of scribes in the early 1400’s, the eventual loss of the need
for them with the printing press, and how the importance of the printing press
isn’t as dire in the 21st century due to mass amateurization. Mass amateurization
places more authority in the consumer’s hands, allowing them to become their
own writers, editors, and publishers. From this point, the masses can decide
what is news worthy, rather than news outlets deeming what should be considered
news. This action was seen early in 2015, surrounding the Chapel Hill Shooting
of Muslim college students. The news of the killings of these students mainly
broke out on Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook. The social media outrage on the
lack of coverage of the incident made headlines as well. Huge news corporations
did not start covering the incident until the morning after. Shirky sees this
shift as something “from news as an institutional prerogative to news as a part
of a communications ecosystem, occupied by a mix of formal organizations,
informal collectives, and individuals”(Shirky, 66). A diversified “new
ecosystem” is created by the Web, no longer placing professional publishers and
journalists at the top of the media outlet food chain.
![]() |
Iphone Lense Dial and Amateurized Photography (Find Image Here) |
The
outcome of mass amateurization is the spread of journalistic privilege to
almost everyone. Shirky claims, “When it was easy to recognize who the
publisher was, it was easy to figure out who the journalists were. We could
regard them as a professional (and therefore minority) category. Now that
scarcity is gone,” (Shirky, 73). Outlets such as blogging, podcasts, and television
are few of many that are now being held at the same caliber as professional journalism.
The primary distinction between professional photographers/journalists and the
public has almost become indistinguishable.
Moreover, the outcome of mass amateurization
is the instant decision to publish something because the process is so
effortless. In Publish, Then Filter,
Shirky adds, “Most of what gets created on any given day is just the ordinary
stuff of life…but now it’s done in the same medium as professionally produced
material”(Shirky, 86). Almost anything is fair game for publishing, whether it’s
a review on a product, a lengthy piece on current affairs, or a tweet about
wanting a Pumpkin Spice Latte. More emphasis is placed on posting quickly
rather than holding off to fully edit content. According to Shirky, this user
generated content is a combination of mass amateurization, mass communication, and
the interactivity through recreative tools. People now can access countless
tools for video, image, and writing, making the increase of publishing among
the masses unprecedented. Shirky concludes, “Amateur production, the result of
all this new capability, means the category of ‘consumer’ is now a temporary
behavior rather than a permanent identity” (Shirky,108).
![]() |
Meme Satirizing Mass Amateurization (Find Image Here) |
Mass
amateurization has created an active participation among the public. In this
active participation, online communities such as fan fiction groups have found
their voice in re writing stories. When thirteen year old Heather Lawver
launched the Daily Prophet, an online
fan fiction newspaper for Harry Potter enthusiasts, it combined all Shirky’s
talking points- an amateurization of J.K. Rowling’s work, instant publication
to share with a larger community, and made the consumer an active participant
in the media. “Consumers
are using new media technologies to engage with old media content, seeing the
Internet as a vehicle for…grassroots creativity” (Jenkins, 175). Despite the legal questions that were asked in
active participation of published work, in Why
Heather Can Write, Jenkins analyzes how fan fiction allowed the opinions of
children to cross generation gaps. Active participation has proven to mold the
minds of future story tellers and improve their writing skills, while mass
amateurization continues to contribute to saturating the specialized class of journalists,
writers, and publishers. These readings suggest that in the specialized fields
of journalism and photography, more will be suspected of said professionals to
distinguish them from the laypeople. Higher standards will be set and a highly competitive
nature will further surround the working spheres of media professionals, all caused
by mass amateurization.
Jenkins,
Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and
New Media Collide. New York: New York UP, 2006. Print.
Shirky,
Clay. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of
Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment