Thursday, September 24, 2015

Society of the Spectacle - Brittney Seegers

In Guy Debord’s The Society of the Spectacle, Debord speaks about the relationship between the spectacle, which in common terms, encompasses all forms of media today and it’s usage, and the society, the consumers who use said technology. For Debord, though the two begin separately, they eventually rely on one another, and states that spectacle exists by “incorporating into itself all the fluid aspects of human activity so as to possess them in a congealed form.” (Debord, 35)
Kylie Jenner, Gigi Hadid & Hailey Baldwin (Instagram)
He goes on to say that the commodity is fetishized and it “attains its ultimate fulfillment in the spectacle, where the perceptible world is replaced by a selection of images which is projected above it, yet which as the same time succeeds in making itself regarded as the perceptible par excellence.” (Debord, 36) The commodity here is described as something intangible. It’s not something you can attain in the regular world, but more of an idea that’s projected upon society until they seem to believe it is within their grasp, but only as something held in the highest regard so that those who don’t reach it have something to continue to strive for. He adds that “the world as once presence and absent that the spectacle holds up to view is the world of the commodity dominating all living experience.” (Debord, 36) We still believe that the world we see is an attainable one, and in that we believe that we are separate from the commodity and that it is just something we need to get without having to actively participate in the production of it.
Debord describes the spectacle as “the stage at which the commodity has succeeded in totally colonizing social life.” (Debord, 42) Before this point, in terms of capitalism, the commodity existed only to create what was needed. The producers, or workers, particularly during the Industrial Revolution, weren’t necessarily concerned with leisure time but more with how their working time was spent in terms of production. Once we reached a point where the amount of product was above the maximum needed output, those same producers were expected to also become consumers of the very products they helped make.
An iPad in line for an iPhone 6S (The Verge)
One prime example of the commodity as spectacle is the iPhone and the selfie culture that came along with it. As a product, the iPhone represents convergence at its height in today’s society. More than a phone, through apps and other developments, it’s used to further advance technology and productivity outside of what the phone itself is actually used for. Beyond it’s technological purposes, the selfie culture bread from apps like Instagram and social media sites like Facebook and Twitter exist to project a certain life onto people, one that’s seemingly superficial as we pick and choose which photos to post, complete with filters and angles we find to be the best ones. As these become the main things people see, they also turn into what people expect life to be like and they all strive to have the same aesthetic. It’s a completely false one, but as everyone decides to tailor their photos to that aesthetic, it becomes accepted as reality. The spectacle becomes a cycle that it seems impossible to get out of.

Debord, Guy. "Chapter 2: The Commodity as Spectacle" Society of the Spectacle. 2002. 

No comments:

Post a Comment